How will your interactive learning resource specifically ensure that the needs of all learners can be met?
My peer review is for Food Studies for Beginners by Learning Pod 9. Overall I think that this Interactive Learning Resource (ILR) was very well planned and well written.
This is Pod 2’s Interactive Learning Resource about parallelism:
Open pedagogy is often based in informal learning, where learners tailor their learning pathway to suit their own needs. Open Educational Resources (OER), free-to-access resources that are available to Reuse, Revise, Remix, and Redistribute as defined by David Wiley’s four R’s (Hegarty, 2015, p.3), are key in facilitating Open Educational Practices (OEP). In OEP, learning is facilitated by both teachers and peers and requires openness, connectedness, trust, and innovation. Continue reading
Expanding on Larissa K.’s post about the direct instruction learning approach:
I like how direct instruction makes it easy to plot out a clear lesson plan across a full curriculum/longer duration of time. It seems very methodical and systematic. The categorization of skill rather than age seems like it would be a very strategic way to organize instruction for different individuals to ensure a full understanding of curriculum materials and so that there are no gaps in their knowledge. Continue reading
Julie wrote about inquiry-based learning environments, and how they apply to English as a Foreign Language learners. Continue reading
Larissa K. wrote about unlearning negative associations with math and relearning positive associations in this post. Continue reading
Reading Julie’s post about learning deign approaches, I especially loved her discussion on how “instructional design is flexible and dynamic” and reflects the changing needs, contexts, and experiences of each student. I connected with this as a learner and agree that instruction is most effective when it is adaptable to different learning styles. Continue reading
Recent Comments